Search for: "State v. State" Results 2941 - 2960 of 258,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am by tracey
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499;  [2012] WLR (D)  121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:37 am by traceydennis
Regina (Maftah and another) v Secretary of State for the Foreign Office and Commonwealth Affairs [2011] EWCA Civ 350;  [2011] WLR (D)  135 “The determination of a claim for judicial review challenging decisions whereby the claimants were placed, as persons believed to be associated with terrorism, on a list the effect of which was that their assets were frozen and release of any funds was placed in the discretion of the state, would not… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Absent a systemic breakdown in a state public defender system, delays caused by appointed counsel are not attributed to the state for purposes of Barker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:01 am by sally
Regina (Kibris Turk Hava Yollari and another) v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1093; [2010] WLR (D) 247 “The Secretary of State for Transport was entitled to refuse to grant operating permits to a Turkish airline and travel agent to allow them to operate scheduled and chartered flights between the United Kingdom and northern Cyprus. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 7:50 am
Regina (Limbu and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others Queen’s Bench Division “It was irrational for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to rely on a discretionary policy relating to settlement entry for Gurkha veterans where that discretion could only be exercised in favour of indefinite leave to remain on the basis of restrictive express factors. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:03 am by traceydennis
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 287 “The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government was not entitled to use the discretionary power to revoke regional strategies contained in s 79(6) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 to effect the practical abrogation of the regional strategies as a complete tier of planning policy guidance. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:44 am
Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Aaron and Others Court of Appeal “In company director disqualification proceedings, the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform could not rely on findings of fact by the Financial Ombudsman Service but he could rely on facts and opinions expressed by the Financial Services Authority. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Buckingham
  Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]