Search for: "State v. Townes"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 5,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 4:35 am
Howard Piltch et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:22 am
” Bluewater Logistics, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
Accordingly, he cannot seek to recover the overpayment in the Supreme Court (see, Honess 52 Corp. v Town of Fishkill, 266 AD2d 510). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 5:15 am
Drummey v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
According to a press release by ClimateEarth, the appellants are calling on the Court to order the government to produce a new plan which will deliver urgent cuts to the illegal levels of air pollution in towns and cities. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:35 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a case with similarities to Town of Greece, NY v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Div. 2015) Following the recent opinion in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Sherman v Town of Chester, 2015 WL 1473430 (SDNY 3/31/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Retaliation [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:35 pm
See Lindeman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:40 am
In Mendez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Paul Horwitz, The Religious Geography of Town of Greece v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:11 am
Supreme Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:37 pm
Khunkhun v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Accordingly, he cannot seek to recover the overpayment in the Supreme Court (see, Honess 52 Corp. v Town of Fishkill, 266 AD2d 510). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm
He then examined our own rich jurisprudence on the issue – the leading case being Independent Newspapers v Minister for Intelligence. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
In Strange v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied (Meng v. [read post]
