Search for: "State v. True"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 21,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
True, the union contract allows aggrieved employees to challenge the arbitration decision in state court, but the arbitration decision in this case was designated a "Final Award." [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
Anyone who believes that the Madison of 1787-88 was a devotee of "states rights" is truly illiterate. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:54 pm
This is not the end of the line for same-sex marriage in New Jersey, however, as Lambda Legal promptly announced that it would go back to the state courts to ask that the constitutional quality promised by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Lewis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:34 pm
Elonis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm
Elonis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
Ever cautious, the Court “save[d] for another day” whether a “true absolute-liability state-law system” (which no state has actually adopted) could escape preemption. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Case citation: Enjaian v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 7:05 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois to allow states to tax out-of-state internet retailers. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
" Maybe I might not have changed my mind (maybe), but I'm not convinced that's true for everyone. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
Wilson * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices * Advertiser Fails in Suit Against Trademark Owner over Google Trademark Complaint--Pandora Jewelers v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Véase Pueblo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:20 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 8:07 am
V. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
So the dissent has a point that the lineup might in part reflect value judgments.Though what's sauce for the goose is equally true for the gander. [read post]
