Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2941 - 2960 of 16,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And because they had money, plaintiffs (or plaintiffs' lawyers) had some prospect of recovering their fees, if they had very strong libel claims. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Three California state courts enforced federal forum provisions for Delaware companies in Wong v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
This week, the Sixth Circuit weighed in on the intersection between unhelpful shortcuts and jury deliberations in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Florian Mueller
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:17 pm by Eliana Baer
This was recently illustrated in a recent Appellate Division decision, Goethals v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
This presumption reflects the requirements of international law, whereby one State should not infringe upon the sovereignty of another, and the rule of comity, which is founded on mutual respect between States. 2. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am by Marcia Coyle
” Justice Scalia gave as an example the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court stated in Vancouver (City) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
  Indeed, one is now beginning to see that way that private actors are attempting to use the methods of data driven governance to hold state and state systems accountable. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am by Josh Blackman
The section begins: Even if the principles of First Amendment law are applicable in the impeachment context (and many of us believe they are not), many of us believe there is an extraordinarily strong argument that the Supreme Court's standards, articulated in Brandenburg v. [read post]