Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2022, 9:14 am
Pegasystems Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Court seems to want to leave false advertising open, but lower courts haven’t taken up that invitation. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 12:02 pm
A recent Federal Circuit case, Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:51 am
One reader wrote, "How can a guy in a non-motorized plastic blow up boat do any harm to anyone but himself? [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:47 am
Boston Duck Tours, LP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
For example, courts have not permitted tacking between the following marks: AMERICAN MOBILPHONE and AMERICAN MOBILPHONE PAGING; SHAPE UP and SHAPE; HOME PROTECTION HARDWARE and HOME PROTECTION CENTER; and PRO-KUT and PRO-CUTS. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
Specifically California Courts ruled that factoring companies violated the California Structured Settlement Protection Act in over 100 Court approved transfers and that the defects meant that the factoring company had violated the California consumer Protection stature. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
The case is Dukes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
When content owners reflect on it, many of them decide to leave up content—so there’s no way for a service provider to categorically decide what the copyright owner wants. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:24 am
The following terms are important in the mortgage and housing profession, but often come up in division of property in a divorce situation: SOURCE: DivorceNet203(b): FHA program which provides mortgage insurance to protect lenders from default; used to finance the purchase of new or existing one- to four-family housing; characterized by low down payment, flexible qualifying guidelines, limited fees, and a limit on maximum loan amount. 203(k): this FHA mortgage… [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
” DC Comics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Consider, for example, European regulators’ willingness to overrule individual consent with respect to employee monitoring or consumer protection. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The other county may not have anyone to offer up. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:40 pm
Stork Resturant, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
Internet and Social Media The long-anticipated Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill has begun its parliamentary journey following its introduction on 25 April 2023. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
The Eleventh Circuit took up the issue in Brown Jordan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:13 pm
Post Foods, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
That agenda is designed to make gasoline and electricity more expensive for consumers, families, farmers, truckers-essentially anyone who fills up or flips a switch. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
Perhaps the parties did not bring that up. [read post]
