Search for: "THOMAS V DEFENSE" Results 2941 - 2960 of 4,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 5:38 am by Lawrence Solum
Here's a marvelous example of "denying the theory assumption," from Dan Farber, himself famous for this move: The last ditch defense of the rational choice theory is to insist that it takes a theory to beat a theory, and that the behavioralists have only assembled a collection of empirical regularities without any unifying theory. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm by George M. Wallace
denying liability and raising appropriate legal and factual defenses rather? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:02 am by admin
Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed with the court’s view that the 1952 Patent Act codified the clear and convincing standard, though he concluded that the standard reflects a common-law rule that has never been overturned by the high court. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/820295.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
Thomas, 10-7502 (previously relisted a whopping eight times), Bustos v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
  This term he refused to join Justice Sotomayor's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof when, by lapse of time, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the crime or offence for which the surrender is asked, according to the laws of the country from which the extradition is demanded, or when his extradition is asked for the same crime or offence for which he has been tried, convicted or acquitted in that country, or so long as he is under prosecution for the same. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
The opinion follows the standard adopted by the Ninth Circuit court in Witt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
Yesterday in Microsoft v. i4i __ U.S. __ (2011)(Sotomayor, J.), opinion below, i4i Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:40 pm by Patent Docs
§ 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]