Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 2941 - 2960 of 16,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 7:18 am by David Markus
United States, 497 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1974), was itself wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
It was first used by Judge Moore in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:30 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
Kraft Foods, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States district courts had interpreted the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:30 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
Kraft Foods, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States district courts had interpreted the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm by Howard Ullman
Girl Scouts of the United States of America, Inc., No. 10-1986 (7th Cir. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:17 pm by Joy Waltemath
Judge Jordan filed a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which he argued that FedEx had waived its challenge to the Specialty Healthcare standard (NLRB v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a new decision in Ryan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am by SHG
Reading the Second Circuit’s affirmance of District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s suppression ruling in United States v. [read post]
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, declaring that a religious duty to engage in polygamy was not a defense to a federal law against bigamy. [read post]