Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 4,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Smith v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
§ 1605(a)(2))—Commercial Activity Elsewhere with Direct Effect in United States Not Found Under Standard Adopted in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
§ 1605(a)(2))—Commercial Activity Elsewhere with Direct Effect in United States Not Found Under Standard Adopted in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
, a question raised in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the definition provided by R 26(4), “plant variety” means any plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a plant variety right are fully met, can be (a) defined by the expression of the characteristics that results from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, (b) distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics,… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
By Eric Goldman Farah v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:14 am
Professor Brand cites the wording of the public policy exception in the Hague Choice of Courts Convention to mean that the ship has “not only set sail in the United States, but globally as well” and articulates a “global position. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:56 am
Therefore he could have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy and Article 8 had not been engaged (X v UK (application No 5877/72) [1973], Friedl v Austria (1995) 21 EHRR 83 and Friend v UK [2010] EHRR SE6). [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a dissenter to the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am
Additionally, both the States and the private plaintiffs in the Supreme Court relied on the 1922 decision in Bailey v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously took Congress at its word last week. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:46 am
But there are hundreds of faiths, and hundreds of denominations within those faiths, in the United States; there are significant practical concerns in either event. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court has granted the plaintiffs’ petition to review the Ninth Circuit ruling, and is poised to resolve the conflict regarding the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court has granted the plaintiffs’ petition to review the Ninth Circuit ruling, and is poised to resolve the conflict regarding the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Astrue v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am
In other words, the programmatic surveillance cannot be designed to acquire communications within the United States or communications by U.S. persons outside the United States. [read post]
