Search for: "United States v. James" Results 2941 - 2960 of 4,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
United States that Congress cannot criminalize Communist Party membership. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am by SHG
  And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Reuters writes that Turkey has asked that the United States and Russia to intervene in Manbij as Turkish-backed rebels clash with U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States.[4]  In Dickerson, the United States Supreme Court considered the validity of a congressional statute providing that police who place a suspect in custody are not obligated to provide the now-famous “Miranda warnings. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
There are some 40,000 job classifications in the United States (a figure used by Justice Stephen Breyer today). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
French legislators have second thoughts on three strikes law (ArsTechnica) Russia BitTorrent admins charged in $1.25bn movie piracy case (TorrentFreak) Spain Music industry threatens OpenBitTorrent’s new hosting provider (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom BT and TalkTalk take on the Digital Economy Act (1709 Blog) Yet more lawyers jump on turn piracy into profit bandwagon (TorrentFreak) PRS wants ISPs to pay for pirating customers (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am by Rick Hasen
Today the James Madison Center filed this application for a stay of the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding state law barring corporate independent spending in state elections. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
 His position is revealed in his judgment (another masterly summary of the relevant law, it goes almost without saying) where he states:... [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
United States, must come from the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm by Danny O'Brien
Anything less would be a violation of the United States' First Amendment. [read post]