Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 2941 - 2960 of 10,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in  Perdue v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
" Back in April 2005, The New York Times reported on the author's initiation of litigation in the United States in an article headlined "Seeking U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
The parties to the lawsuit had sold a database, which collected police reports from across the United States, to LexisNexis. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am by Ekow Yankah
United States – which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday in the final argument of its 2020-21 term – packs so many swirling issues of great importance into an absurdly little case, it can hardly be believed. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
In 2003 the United States Supreme Court gave us the decision of Lawrence vs. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
In 2003 the United States Supreme Court gave us the decision of Lawrence vs. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am by SHG
United States, testing the scope of the First Amendment when words that certainly sound like true threats are made on Facebook by a man after his wife left him. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
  Specifically, it states that a “court of the United States”, i.e., a federal court, “shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:48 am by Susan Brenner
The judge also found that there was no evidence to show that Wang did not understand English and therefore did not understand the rights as administered to him since, among other things, he “maintained a Facebook page on which he wrote comments in English and he attended college in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
The en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Katie
Accordingly, the detention did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and, consequently, the district court properly denied Appellant's motion to suppress.Affirmed.J. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
McGraw Hill et al, was then heard on Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]