Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:37 am
(See Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981)For communications to be regarded as privileged, they must be treated as privileged. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
For all of the reasons discussed here, here, and here, STL has not been a fan of the United States Olympic Committee’s efforts to enforce its near monopoly rights in the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Public Deserves to See Secret Law Written by Office of Legal Counsel Washington, DC - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today asked the Supreme Court of the United States to weigh in on a long-standing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in which EFF sought to obtain a secret legal memo authorizing the FBI to obtain phone records without any legal process. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
by: Mark A. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
In a recent article, Michael Solimine argues that the Office of the Solicitor General should limit its involvement to cases in which the interests of the United States are directly affected, as opposed to cases concerning the “broader policy agenda” of the administration. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:45 am
In fact, Denmark and the United States are the only countries in the world to set a specific monetary limit on the debt. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
RFA Brands, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
” NECA “is a leading provider of collectible figures, games and game equipment in the United States and abroad. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
“[V]isitors to [defendant’s] Internet homepage were able to click a link [to purchase defendant’s product] . . . and then select ‘United States’ and ‘Delaware’ from separate drop-down menus. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
MARQUES Class 46 (trade marks) * EUIPO “smart-seals” (?) [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:30 pm
Only in the United States! [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Ben Challis, writing on the 1709 Blog, reports a not entirely unsurprising but nonetheless significant ruling from the United States that a download is not a performance for the purposes of copyright law. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Hill Harper is well-known as an actor and author in the United States of America. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am
However … [it] has not used the mark in any meaningful way anywhere… [and] the record is devoid of evidence that would create a genuine issue of material fact that [it] uses the mark CASINO DE MONACO to identify its services, anywhere, but particularly in the United States. [read post]
