Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 2941 - 2960 of 24,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 10:52 am by Gene Quinn
As many of you undoubtedly already know, the United States Supreme Court will soon decide whether software is patent eligible in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, concluding that (contra the position advanced by the IRS), stocks do not constitute "money renumeration" and are therefore not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
However, if the person is not removed from the United States after 90 days, they may be released and placed under supervision. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am by Will Baude
But that’s what happened in the Second Circuit’s decision Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
Major A recent decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas may have caused grave damage to protections long available to overseas government contractors and their employees under the Defense Base Act (“DBA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]