Search for: "Walker v. Walker" Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Walker, Judge Kay flatly rejected both of those challenges. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 10:49 am by Giles Peaker
However, in calculating the 12 months, the UT found that the  rule in Dodds v Walker (1981) 1 WLR 1027 did not apply here – that rule says that in calculating a month or number of months after an event, one simply goes to the day of that month that bears the same number as the day of the earlier month on which the notice was given. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm by Mark Walsh
During oral argument in 1996 in a case involving blockades of abortion centers, Schenck v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:42 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
La Secretaria del Departamento de Justicia, Wanda Vázquez Garced, y el Secretario del DSP, Héctor M. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
But the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that incorrect advice on matters that are collateral to the criminal case don't make out a case of ineffective assistance under the Supreme Court's Strickland v. [read post]