Search for: "Wise v. State"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,073
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
As was stated by Lamer J. in Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 11:45 pm
According to the 6th Circuit's ruling late last week in Fox v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
A word to the wise should be sufficient, so if you don't already, learn how to navigate and use the FDA's site. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
The Court’s subsequent denial of certiorari in Eichorn v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
For example, there is a federal case named Henderson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:50 am
This case challenges the "Safe Third Country Agreement" between Canada and the United States that came into force in December 2004. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Ferguson and who similarly ignored the wise corresponding dissent of that same Justice Harlan.Epstein writes about the PRA and the new damage rule:"The key damage provision states "The court shall conduct an analysis to ensure that a reasonable royalty . . . is applied only to that economic value properly attributable to the patent's specific contribution over the prior art. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
In Harrington-Wisely v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Helping Family Voices address these challenges are partners at the state Title V/CSHCN agency, the Children's Hospital, Agenda for Children, MCH, the UAP, and the Academy of Pediatrics. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Though, to be honest, I'd rather have Cythia Albritton perform this task than the State of California.But barely. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:53 am
The Court affirmed its 1999 decision in Nahatchewitz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
Jasperson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
Supreme Court was reasonably similar in this respect... before Bush v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Whether such a requirement is wise, of course, may be a different issue. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
The suit, Byers v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
[17] Internal Revenue Service, United States Departmente of the Treasury, Limited Liability Company, [www.irs.gov] (last visited Nov. 3, 2007) [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:03 am
In December 2006 the United States' Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to include specific provision for electronic discovery. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 3:51 pm
The case is Billups v. [read post]
