Search for: "v. " Results 2941 - 2960 of 493,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Kent Scheidegger
This morning, my computer robot searched the SCOTUS docket for new cases and served up the case of University of South Carolina v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 6:51 am
Standard YouTube Licence Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Nugee) E Mishan & Sons, Inc (t/a Emson) v Hozelock Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 991 (Pat) (17 April 2019)  This was a claim for the infringement of two patents:  UK patent GB 2 490 276 for an expandable hose assembly and European patent EP 2 687 575 also for an expandable hose assembly. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:58 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Case Western Reserve University School of Law) has posted Perry V. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:23 pm
The importance of Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011) is that it was the first trial under the new rules for the Patents County Court and thus the first opportunity for the court to consider the cost capping rules in the context of an entire case. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
Michael Atkins (a/k/a the Seattle Trademark Lawyer) has graciously offered to host "Meet the Bloggers V" at this year's INTA Annual Meeting in Seattle.Date: Monday, May 18 Time: 6-9 p.m. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm
Author Satoshi Nakamoto Source Wikimedia Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Mellor) Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Wright [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch) (20 May 2024)Bitcoin was the world's first cryptocurrency, a digital currency that does not depend on a government, bank or other central institution to function. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:06 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Today Judge Hayes set deadlines for any replies to be filed in connection with motion practice in Martin v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:20 am by Mary Whisner
Saturday marked the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:45 am by John McFarland
Link to the opinion is here: burlington v texas crude This is the first case to follow Chesapeake v. [read post]