Search for: "A B"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 158,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
There are of course six pairwise sums of these integers, a+b, a+c, a+d, b+c, b+d, and c+d.Some number of these pairwise sums might be divisors of the sum of all four integers, a+b+c+d. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:10 am
Finally, the district court addressed the question of scienter, Goplen, at 770 et seq., explaining that “To plead scienter under Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA, the complaint must allege facts that give rise to a strong inference of fraudulent intent,” id., at 771. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:44 am
Torts — Liability of county — Scope of employment Amelia Mercer, Appellee, filed a complaint against Watts & Sims, Inc. d/b/a Trade Winds Night Club (“Trade Winds”) and Prince George’s County, Maryland, (the “County”) alleging that she was battered by an unknown off-duty Prince George’s County police officer. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 4:47 am
POSTPONING THE GALA: “Amid an intensified ethics investigation of Representative Charles B. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:32 pm
Lefèvre: Le Bâtiment 7, philanthropic foundations, and universities – The story of a common ground appeared first on The Philanthropist. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Trustee’s office under section 707(b). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:59 am
., co-chairs of the firm's Medicare and RAC department authored an ABA Health eSource article titled "CMS Acquiesces to Hospital Pressure, Allows Part B Billing of Hospital Services Following Part A Denial of Inpatient Hospital Claims for Medical Necessity: Is It Enough?" [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:19 pm
eyda B? [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm
In assessing whether a debtor’s bankruptcy case was filed in good faith for the purpose of Code § 362(c)(3)(B), courts have considered the following non-exhaustive list of factors: (1) the timing of the petition, (2) how the debtor’s debts arose, (3) the debtor’s motive, (4) how the debtor’s actions affected creditors, (5) why the debtor’s [...] [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 8:44 am
Circuit cases in which Chief Judge Merrick B. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:57 pm
The issue of interest in this case centered around whether there was a pre-AIA 102(b) on-sale bar. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:07 am
Ceterix Orthopaedics, Inc. has announced it has raised $19.5 million in series B financing led by Novo Ventures. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
” Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) and FRCP 26(b)(5)(B) provide a framework for handling the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
” Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) and FRCP 26(b)(5)(B) provide a framework for handling the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information. [read post]
