Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 2961 - 2980 of 9,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2017, 11:30 am by Joshua A. Geltzer
All in all, an amicus could argue that, when it comes to the showdown between the courts and the President crystallized by Trump’s pardon, the Supreme Court has said it’s the courts that prevail. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
Throughout his presidency, Trump has had the advantage of Republican majorities in both Houses of Congress and a Republican majority on the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:53 am by SHG
Judges on the US district and appeals courts often look to the Supreme Court for guidance. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
He also cited comments made by Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor about breaking up the Ninth Circuit back in 1998. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court recognizes a new right that could affect their sentence. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am by Steve Kalar
” Id. at *8.Of Note: In the 1980 Sullivan decision, the Supreme Court presumed prejudice when defense counsel had an actual conflict – thereby avoiding the prejudice requirements of “normal” Strickland challenges. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 am by sevenslegal
The right to remain silent in a criminal case, commonly referred to as one’s Miranda warning, stems from a 1966 United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 am by sevenslegal
The right to remain silent in a criminal case, commonly referred to as one’s Miranda warning, stems from a 1966 United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:28 am by Brian Frye
The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona indicted the ringleaders of the vigilance committee, but the Supreme Court held that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court’s justices, the principal expositor of the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:05 am by Ilya Somin
September 8, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY, noon-1:30 PM: Panel on the travel ban case currently before the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
The court noted at the outset that under Arizona law, Boards of adjustment could not: change the uses permitted in a zoning district; or grant a variance if the special circumstances applicable to the property are self-imposed by the property owner. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 4:04 pm by Shawn R. Dominy
Arizona, the United States Supreme Court created the Miranda warnings as procedural safeguards to protect the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am by Staci Zaretsky
Neal Katyal of Hogan Lovells has asked the Supreme Court to hear an Arizona death row inmate's case, arguing that the state's death penalty law is unconstitutional and that it must be struck down. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf cites two upcoming Supreme Court cases, Husted v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
"A Top Lawyer Asks Supreme Court To Hear A Major Death Penalty Case; In a new filing, Neal Katyal is asking the high court to consider Arizona's death penalty law -- and whether the death penalty itself is unconstitutional": Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News has this report. [read post]