Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:48 am
Courts Divided on Prosecuting Violent Juveniles as Adults: The validity of SB 1391, A California law which bars the prosecution of violent juveniles in adult court, will likely be determined by the state supreme court. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:37 pm
Jewell (Tribal Enrollment, Ancestral Lineage)County of Amador, California v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:21 am
In October the First District launched its judicial mentorship program to develop and recruit qualified and diverse applicants for the state's courts of appeal. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
Dr Strong, who is qualified as a lawyer at the New York and Illinois bars and as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales, holds a Ph.D. in law from the University of Cambridge, a D.Phil. from the University of Oxford, a J.D. from Duke University, an M.P.W. from the University of Southern California and a B.A. from the University of California. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
Breyer’s dissent, the Court refused to hear that question in a California case. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
State Bar Ass'n, 244 Neb. 786, 792, 508 N.W.2d 917, 922 (1993) (endorsing the Letter Carriers analysis). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:00 pm
The California State Bar provides and excellent pamphlet explaining all the details and steps you need to take to win your small claims court case. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
The Supreme Court today granted certiorari in the California death penalty case of Cullen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm
The Indian Child Welfare Act's application to civil commitments of Indian children in state court proceeding. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:02 am
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; En Banc Petition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html City of Sammamish v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:18 pm
California, et al. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm
IQVIA Holdings Inc – United States District Court – Southern District of California – October 7, 2022) involves a claims of misappropriation of trade secrets under state and federal law. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:30 am
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.html Access to justice: Impact of Twombly & Iqbal on state court systems. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:14 pm
"Therefore, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's ruling as it stated "that because the Trust Instrument states that all of Mabee's "right, title and interest" to "all of his real . . . property" is included in the Trust's assets, and it is possible by resorting to extrinsic evidence to determine that Mabee held title to the Two Parcels, the statute of frauds creates no bar to Ukkestad's… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
The Clean Air Act permits California alone to adopt its own standards for certain emissions, while requiring other states to follow either California’s standards or federal regulations. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 9:30 pm
A California task force earlier this year recommended that newly minted lawyers be required to complete fifty pro bono hours as a condition of entry to that state’s bar, and a judicial working group in New Jersey is currently considering a similar rule – although that state’s bar association has already come out against the idea. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Belmora's FLANAXBayer's Section 43(a) claims: The district court found that Bayer's Section 43 claims for unfair competition and false advertising, and its similar claims under California law, were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
The September 2012 issue of Plaintiff Magazine has an interesting and lengthy article by Oakland attorney Bryan Schwartz, who is a member of the Executive Committee of the State Bar Labor and Employment Law Section. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:04 am
Constitution’s dormant commerce clause, which bars state regulation where the “practical effect” is to control conduct in other states. [read post]
