Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 2961 - 2980 of 9,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk
United States that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) does not apply to criminal prosecutions. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
 Allergan retained rights to exploit the patents "for all FDA-approved uses in the United States". [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:14 am by Anthony Zaller
  In addition, it appears that there were nearly 30 million telephones connected to the phone system in the United States by 1948. 4. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Harry Larson
United States set the stage for the detainer debate by significantly limiting state authority to enforce civil provisions of federal immigration law. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:10 am by Jamison Koehler
United States: What happens if the evidence introduced by the government at the probation hearing is different than the evidence it presented at trial? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
He escaped Sri Lanka to Mexico in June 2016 and in February 2017 crossed the border and entered the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:51 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-1378Issues: (1) Whether under the Supreme Court’s precedent in United States v. [read post]