Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 21,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm
Now it appears that a state probably could ban child pornography without regard to whether it has serious value: In the words of the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:02 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:38 am
Drug offenses in Massachusetts were made more difficult to prove by the United States Supreme Courts' decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 7:58 am
In the 40 years since Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act, the law has been criticized in legal challenges that have climbed all the way to the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:58 pm
State, and earlier in Ervin Crabtree v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm
In Gaeta v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 6:44 am
From Fakoya v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Additional Resources: Bryan M. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
Additional Resources: Bryan M. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm
First, no one has ever seriously questioned the constitutionality of state child labor laws, and every state in the union passed such laws by the 1930s. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
In Souratgar v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Prouty v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Prouty v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 10:26 am
Supreme Court supporting the death penalty for child rapists. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
The Court's 5-4 decision, declaring the death penalty unconstitutional and disproportionate for perpetrators of child rape, was largely based on the contention that only 6 states considered child rape a capital offense, indicating that it is not in keeping with "evolving standards of decency. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 3:49 pm
Duane Dale Big Eagle (bribery of tribal official)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmThea G. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:50 pm
MARSHALL V. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am
It explained in detail how to determine a child's habitual residence in Koch v. [read post]