Search for: "Decisive Media, Inc." Results 2961 - 2980 of 4,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Trademark decisions have repeatedly reaffirmed artists’ rights to use marks in this way, especially in works of fiction. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
These decisions are for a Court to make and Google should not be troubled other than to make sure that they comply with the orders. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
If anything, the comment only suggested that the employee’s performance was a motivating factor in the company’s decision to release him. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:20 am
The PTO refused registration of the mark shown below for "production and distribution of movies" on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark MARVELOUS MEDIA for, inter alia, the identical services [MEDIA disclaimed]. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:21 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Horton, Inc. and work rules like at-will, off-duty access, social media, confidentiality and other policies. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Epstein Becker Green
Horton, Inc. and work rules like at-will, off-duty access, social media, confidentiality and other policies. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Epstein Becker Green
Horton, Inc. and work rules like at-will, off-duty access, social media, confidentiality and other policies. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:24 am by Sam Turco
Nebraska Student Loan Program Inc., 232 B.R.127 (B.A.P. 8th Cir 1999), the Andresen decision actually requires that each separate loan be reviewed for discharge independently. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:12 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Stan Lee Media Loses Appeal Over ‘Conan the Barbarian’ Rights First off today, Eriq Gardner at The Hollywood Reporter Esquire reports that Stan Lee Media Inc (SLMI) has lost in court once again, this time in the 9th Circuit denying an appeal on the character of Conan the Barbarian. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:34 pm by Lisa Stam
  For example, in the summary judgment case of Eagle Professional Resources Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:41 am by Tim Sitzmann
The facts here may or may not be sufficient to show a defense based on acquiescence (See  Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm by Geoff Cockrell
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. [read post]