Search for: "Frank v. State"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 8:53 am
In the case of Leshinksy v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:06 pm
The Spencer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
In 2002, Atkins v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
" is the Balkinization post by Frank Pasquale. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
Clearing houses, also called central counterparties (CCP) are an important part of the regulatory reforms called for under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:29 am
Docs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the appeal of Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue & Anor [2012] UKSC 19 on 23 May 2012. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:31 am
The style is United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm
Pursuant to Section 1077 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the report covers (i) the evolution and current state of the private lending market, (ii) the characteristics of consumers of private student loans, (iii) consumer protections, including recent changes and possible gaps, (iv) fair lending compliance information currently available and its implications, and (v) statutory or legislative recommendations to improve consumer protections. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:06 am
Frank Music v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Supreme Court in Magner v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
” The Secretary of State appealed these findings. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
The case cite is Rearden LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:17 am
2011AP682-CR State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
She stated that the SEC did give priority to the Dodd-Frank provisions with statutory deadlines, but the SEC has not de-prioritized D [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:23 am
Case materials in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:34 am
In this case, the Senate report accompanying Dodd-Frank Section 929A stated that the intent of the amendment was to clarify Section 806. [read post]
