Search for: "Harris v. State" Results 2961 - 2980 of 5,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am by Andy Schlafly
Kamala Harris has represented California in the Senate since 2017. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by AskPat
Moore told a high school to ban the book for violating separation of church and state. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
Or perhaps Republicans would simply nominate Trump for president and expect--with some justification given the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:52 am by Steve Vladeck
However the Supreme Court decides the travel ban case in the next 10 days, it may well avoid taking a position on one of the numerous issues raised in that litigation — whether the district court in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
  The State filed a motion to dismiss, asserting the  ITCA has no extraterritorial applicability. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Here, in summary, are the other two granted cases: * Harris v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
Sep. 26, 2008)(per curiam) (condemnation appeal, State prevails)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]