Search for: "Head v. The University" Results 2961 - 2980 of 3,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
Carl Gardner, author of the Head of legal blog,  has this analysis of this week’s case célèbre (sic): Employment Tribunal ruling: O’Reilly v BBC and Adam Wagner of 1 Crown Office Row, writing on their UK Human Rights blog, stated…Still almost impossible to sue the police in negligence Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police 2011] EWCA Civ 3 (12 January 2011)- Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that it is… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
ICG America (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Microsoft  – Microsoft says Apple’s ‘App Store’ trademark too generic to exist (ArsTechnica) (Innovationpartners) Soaring Helmet – Keyword advertiser headed to trial: Soaring Helmet v Nanal (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The majority upheld Mitting J’s conclusion view that the provisions of the CTA were intended to exclude such a universal right to consultation. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Very capable journalists, who no doubt dreamt at University of being a foreign correspondent in Paris, Bonn or Rome devote their working lives to destroying the private lives of those who have, or rather had, a personal, sexual secret the revelation of which will titillate the reader. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
Furthermore, it was universally accepted that irreparable harm should be presumed once invalidity arguments failed and infringement of the patent was established. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In a very interesting opinion last week in Byrd v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:17 am by Scott A. McKeown
 It is unclear whether or not Sigram will now head back to the EDVA, or simply follow in the footsteps of The Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:56 am by Seth
AGA Medical and the University of Minnesota have been locked in patent litigation since late November, 2007, over two patents relating to a medical device used in the repair of holes in hearts. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court in cases like Lochner v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:17 am by Adam Wagner
The Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church which he heads, is against abortion. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am by Michael Scutt
The hoary old debate about the death of blogging at the hands of Twitter raised its head again recently, as it does from time to time. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by Rumpole
For the rest of the educated universe, most of us are not comfortable with the government killing a citizen based on a proceeding in which a fundamental process was fumbled away in error. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:54 am by Randy Barnett
This, in turn, seems to violate the standard understanding of implied federal power contained in canonical decisions like McCulloch v. [read post]