Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
They need guidance on the many cases they’re wrestling with today. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Online dispute resolution (hereinafter ODR) is currently being incorporated into U.S and international court systems, re-shaping and re-defining justice as we know it today. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:39 pm
What effects do criminal records have on former offenders ability to re-assimilate? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:15 am
So what do you do when you’re Cloudflare? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:23 am
In re Soremartec SA, Serial No. 79204456 (February 20, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson).The Examining Attorney argued that the word PETITS is merely descriptive of the Applicant’s goods “in that it refers to their size because the goods are small. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:00 pm
After her arrest, the judge in her case set bail at $1 million because she was perceived as a drug trafficker. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:29 pm
” As pointed out in Judge Taranto’s concurrence, the legislative history makes clear that the one year window was designed to thwart Patent Owner harassment by limiting the time for filing an IPR, citing 157 Cong. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
But they’re not identical, and the jurisprudence, despite Judge Ho’s contention, is not at all the same.Judge Ho notes that “Three circuits to date have construed Title VII to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination or transgender discrimination. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
As Mike Dorf put it, the “new originalists" in the academy “make originalism respectable by answering objections leveled at ‘expectations based originalism’— but judges, elected officials, and the public misuse the credibility that these scholars lend to to originalism more broadly by relying on evidence about the framers' and ratifiers' expected applications in considering concrete cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
In fact, they’re designed to discriminate against disfavored political expression, which is why two federal courts and several prominent First Amendment scholars have agreed that these laws violate the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
That’s what judges most want. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm
They believe these kinds of individuals are prone to re-arrest and pose an unacceptable risk to the safety of the community. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
(citing In re Appropriation for Hwy. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:52 am
If you’re not married, this can be more difficult. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:38 am
In response, the examining attorney cited In re Nett Designs, Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:50 am
In fact, if there’s any competitive injury here, it’s due to the maintenance of this dubious lawsuit designed to squelch competition. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Judging by the ICJ’s order indicating preliminary measures in the nuclear sanctions case, the U.S. is on more solid ground in [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:29 am
In re Trivia Today, LLC, Serial Nos. 86760550 and 86745338 (February 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Grewal used to serve as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California. [read post]
