Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2961 - 2980
of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2018, 4:03 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re remarks that although “[t]he Justices often intone that theirs is ‘a court of review, not of first view,’” “last Monday’s decisions illustrate the complexities underlying that maxim,” suggesting that “the ‘first view’ principle is more discretionary than it often appears—and that the Court could do more to explain what guides its choices in this area. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
Justice Moreno held that you couldn't be convicted of receiving stolen property for that gun in your possession, and the rest of the justices agreed with him. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:28 pm
Life in prison and the only thing we're briefing is a $130 fee he's never going to pay anyway? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
In a later case, A Local Authority v W [2006] 1 FLR 1, the Court of Appeal cautioned against approaching the Re S exercise on the basis that it was ‘a mechanical exercise to be decided upon the basis of rival generalities’. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:35 am
It bears the citation to Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
’” (quoting In re Bates, No. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:53 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
" In re MCP No. 165, 20 F. 4th, at 272 (Sutton, C. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The arguments Ms Beech argued that the Ropaigealach decision had to be re-examined in light of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
GREEN, Justice. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
Grace v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Now you’re trying my patience. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
Is designation as a listed building conclusive, or can the inspector re-determine its validity? [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:06 pm
This was not a fair procedure and on that ground alone the decision must be set aside and remitted to the FTT for a re-hearing. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] Justice Kagan wrote "Now Congress will have to fix a statute this Court has broken."
9 Aug 2022, 8:00 pm
You're welcome. [read post]
30 May 2014, 5:14 am
In a post at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the Court’s decision in Hall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:22 pm
Call it justice. [read post]
