Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 2961 - 2980
of 3,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
It's based on the assumption the agency will close three facilities and lay off 587 workers, as well as "reducing TYC central office salaries by 10%. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
For most of us, our initial inclination is to run for cover. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Japan, under the Hatoyama Initiative, has pledged more than $9 billion, according to Environment Minister Sakihito Ozawa, but the exact amount is still being discussed. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 6:18 am
You're going to benefit, we're going to lose. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:13 pm
Despite continued efforts by the federal government and state governments to patch together a safety net for distressed homeowners, we’re seeing a significant growth in both the initial notices of default and in the bank repossessions. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
The crime occurred between 10:30 or 10:40 p.m., when Shandra's aunt checked on her and her brother Reginald (R. 608), and 11:30 p.m., when Shandra's mother arrived home from work and found her daughter (R. 635). [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 8:54 am
A Dallas Morning News analysis of sentencing in more than 13,000 cases of aggravated sexual assault of a child since 1991 found that four of every 10 offenders initially received no prison time at all. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 11:44 am
You must ask the right questions: Did they see what happened? [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:00 pm
This initial state can be crucial for understanding how and why the accident happened. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
The second is that when collection takes place overseas, “the assumption is you’re not a U.S. person”, i.e. an American or green card holder. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
* Domestic violence victim assistance: Volunteers will assist victims of domestic violence in obtaining asylum relief through a program initiated and funded by the United States Department of Justice [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 5:35 pm
This is a medical question. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” The Court acknowledged that “may” means a “reasonable possibility,” and that the fair argument standard under Public Resources Code § 21151 “creates a low threshold requirement for initial preparation of an EIR and reflects a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review when the question is whether any such review is warranted. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
This is the question of the great forgetting. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm
“Mistakes happen and things have to be re-done. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:14 pm
The Belt and Road Initiative cannot help but serve these ends (in part) if it is to remain true to the essence of Leninism. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
This thinking is based on the assumption that parties which derogated the jurisdiction of state courts do not want to re-litigate their dispute there.9 Any intervention of state authorities in the realm of arbitration is considered to be an intrusion.10 Basically, this system is rooted in a deep distrust of state intervention in arbitration proceedings. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
It authorizes class certification where “questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and [where] a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:07 am
If you’re not a criminal defence lawyer, you have no idea what you are doing. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
But the HydroThermAblator had gone through the FDA’s not-particularly-rigorous premarketing approval (“PMA”) process, and so the bulk of potential negligence claims against Boston Scientific for making an expensive medical device that didn’t work as well as a $10 tea kettle were “expressly preempted” by § 360k of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Riegel v. [read post]
