Search for: "Jackson v. State" Results 2961 - 2980 of 6,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
Maybe conservative activists have no burning desire to overrule Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Daniel Shaviro
Meanwhile, only Justice Jackson, in a concurring opinion that no other justice joined, stated forthrightly that there is no realization requirement in the 16th Amendment.So let us express relief about the present, along with continued concern about the future. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, each of the separate opinions contended that the 16th Amendment (ratified in 1913) "overruled" Pollock v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
Mar. 27, 2009)(per curiam) (absence of evidence of notice insufficient to satisfy requirement of error on face of the record for purpose of restricted appeal)EMMANUEL GINN, A&R TRANSPORT, INC., KEITH JACKSON, STEVE BRANTLEY v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Jackson Women's Health, Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
LEXIS 9298 (ED CA, Jan. 28, 2009), a federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA challenge to the state Department of Corrections hair-length regulations.In Kay v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by William Baude
On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s decision in Calder v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:04 am by Steve Lubet
BY STEVEN LUBET, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 11/30/22 8:00 AM ET It looks as though there will be no end to the fallout from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:08 pm
In Big AWA Decision in Oklahoma posted at Sex Crimes, we get a discussion of the decision in US v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:04 am by Steve Lubet
BY STEVEN LUBET, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 11/30/22 8:00 AM ET It looks as though there will be no end to the fallout from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]