Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 2961 - 2980 of 6,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Tarah Demant, the National Director of Programs at Amnesty International USA, said that the court’s decision to overturn Roe has led to “a patchwork of devastating laws” across the country. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am by Orin Kerr
Clapper in March, opening and closing my post with the following two paragraphs:On Monday, the Second Circuit handed down a very important decision on standing to challenge secret surveillance programs in Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:27 am by Christopher Bird
Each week Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.Mason v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKInternational TradeCourt Rejects Bid for Duty-Free Treatment For Imported Petroleum Products at Issue In re Bulk Oil (USA) Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Solomon Kaplan, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeDeath of A Party Did Not Stop Decision Being Rendered If Death Occurred After Motion Argued, Submitted PDV (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:36 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
Phillip Morris USA the cigarette producer argued that jury instructions were illegal under Florida law by allowing the jury to decide some of the issues in question and leave others for a new trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:32 pm
" It should be noted that in her written opinion filed last January, Circuit Judge Diane Goodstein expressly found that there were no such bodies in the Episcopal Church (USA) that had outside jurisdiction over either the Diocese or any of its parishes.Another point decided by the Waccamaw court is that ECUSA's Dennis Canon did not, in and of itself, create an enforceable religious trust on parish property under South Carolina law. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Spiegla, 481 F.3dat 964 (7th Cir. 2007) (holding that defendants had notwaived challenge to holding in first appeal where issuenot raised on remand in district court or initial briefingbecause intervening decision was issued after appellatebriefing); Mendenhall, 26 F.3d at 1583 (law of the case didnot apply where new decision issued while case on appeal);Morris v. [read post]