Search for: "Levi v Levi"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 3,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 2:47 pm
Levy v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:22 am
SRAM Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 5:25 am
In Bruk v Razag, Inc., Levi Bruk sued after he fell at a wedding catered by Razag, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:13 am
Levy" Yael V. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:48 am
Tuesday's ruling, in Brunson v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:23 pm
Casale v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
Florida (08-7412) and Graham v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:56 pm
Last October, Levy argued before the court in an ERISA case called Kennedy et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:48 pm
There’s a good recap of the Jones Day v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Yuval Simchi-Levi of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
(See Levy & Pruett Blog Post dated March 2, 2009.) [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 7:53 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:39 pm
The California Supreme Court reached a sensible decision in Silverbrand v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:25 pm
Levy In Roberts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:28 am
The Court then went through all of the Minnesota AG's claimed causes of action (claims under the Minnesota Colelction Agencies Act, Minnesota Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Minnesota Levy and Garnishment Statutes) and held that none of these provided the AG with a cause of action against Messerli & Kramer.Minnesota, et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Topics up for discussion ranged from multilateral and bilateral relations, the role of the Judiciary in shaping IP policy, Web 2.0 exceptions and limitations, comparative damages in copyright, acquisition of evidence in patent cases, right of publicity/ privacy for trade mark (on day one) to enforcement and counterfeiting, patent law developments in Japan and US v China in WTO on day two, ending with a particularly lively talk chaired by Dr Tilman Luder (Head of the Copyright Unit for the… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:43 am
The Court referred to Goglio v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:49 pm
In Knoblauch v. [read post]
