Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2961 - 2980 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Unknown
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Kader Kadem
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
One of the best known examples of this point of view was that advanced by Lord Woolf in A v B plc [2003] QB 195, (the Gary Flitcroft case), in which he argued that ‘any interference with the press has to be justified because it inevitably has some effect on the ability of the press to perform its role in society. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
  Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Notably, Lord Bingham’s judgment began:“A general public duty to house the homeless or provide for the destitute cannot be spelled out of article 3. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Notably, Lord Bingham’s judgment began:“A general public duty to house the homeless or provide for the destitute cannot be spelled out of article 3. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
The beginning of state intervention The Clandestine Marriages Act 1753 (Lord Hardwicke’s Act) put all that Canon Law onto a statutory basis. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:11 am
Such an approach is also supported by a decision of the House of Lords in Clark v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]