Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Comment Lord Walker concluded his judgment on the expenditure issue by confirming that the previous House of Lords decisions in this area (namely, Ensign Tankers and Barclays Mercantile) remain good law. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
The most recent report of the Mental Health Act Commission stated that 13 patients were detained under the Mental Health Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
Lord Neuberger, Master of the Rolls: “Since 2000, no. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:17 am
U.S., Black v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
Accountability requires that the accountable person is obliged to explain the state of affairs tohttp://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/shoesmith-v-ofsted-others-judgment-270511.pdfwhich it attaches. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Rodger alone dissented. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am
One is being appealed in the normal way by the Secretary of State for Education, but the other may lead to a fundamental rethink of the Scottish justice system. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am
Lord Justice Maurice Kay accepted that “the context – the protection of vulnerable children – is important and, together with a degree of urgency may impact on the requirement of procedural fairness“. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:51 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen, United… [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
In the first part of this series, we considered how the ECHR has expanded the scope of article 8 rights, beyond the “new strength and breadth” which Lord Woolf had predicted in 2002 (in A v B) that the mis-named action for “disclosure of confidential information which would infringe privacy” would have. [read post]
