Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
” (my emphasis)The present decision is such a post-G 1/07 decision. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
(b) An issue of unconscionability of a premarital agreement shall be decided by the court as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
" In fact, the free writing prospectus is now pretty much the only place where a credit rating can be disclosed in a securities offering, because Dodd-Frank's repeal of Rule 436(g), as a practical matter, prevents the disclosure of credit ratings in a prospectus (or report incorporated by reference into a prospectus) for the purpose of offering the security. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
By Thomas G. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
(3) Subject to the provisions of clauses (a), (c) and (i) of sub-section (1), any information relating to any occurrence, event or matter which has taken place, occurred or happened twenty years before the date on which any request is made under secton 6 shall be provided to any person making a request under that section: Provided that where any question arises as to the date from which the said period of twenty years has to be computed, the decision of the Central… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Whether a particular action constitutes a "transfer" is a matter of federal law. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (op. on reh'g). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
In G 1/93 […] it is stated that “If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed within the meaning of A 123(2) and which also limits the scope of protection conferred by the patent, such patent cannot be maintained in opposition proceedings unamended, because the ground for opposition under A 100(c) prejudices the maintenance of the patent. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
” R. 4:50-1(a), (c), (f). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:42 am
The debtor absconded; g. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Article 6 not engaged, court applies R (G) v X School Governors (a Supreme Court case). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
D2 is found to be the closest prior art.*** Translated from the German ***[4.3] The storage device according to claim 1 differs from the one of D2 by a first group of distinguishing features (hereinafter: “first group of features”), i.e. the part of feature [g] concerning the arrangement of full strand and empty strand, as well as feature [h]. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
§ 701(b)(1)(G). [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:28 pm
’” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2842; Muslim, 2549) (c) Not offending them or saying or doing anything that they dislike. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:17 pm
Judge Joseph G. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:17 pm
Judge Joseph G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
JPML Rule 7.2(c). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
JPML Rule 7.2(c). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Even though by itself not decisive (“whether or not a method is excluded from patentability under A 53(c) cannot depend on the person carrying it out” G 1/07 [3.4.1] see also G 1/04 discussed therein), this criterion gives a further indication that the claimed method might fall under the exclusion clause. [read post]
