Search for: "Motion" Results 2961 - 2980 of 152,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2015, 4:41 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
., the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the following claims: assault (Counts I, VIII, and XV), battery (Counts II, IX, and XVI), negligence (Counts III, X, and XVII), products liability (Counts IV, XI, and XVIII), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts V, XII, and XIX), gross negligence (VI, XIII, and XX), and res ipsa loquitur (Counts VII, XIV, and XI). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:47 am by Mark Terry
Research in Motion, Inc (RIM), a leader in mobile communications (see one of their key patents, US5802312 here), has been in the news lately due to a weaker than expected earnings report which sparked concerns about RIM's true value. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
In orders yesterday in GlaxoSmithKline's effort to stop implementation of the new continuation and claim limit rules, the USPTO's request to continue the preliminary injunction hearing until October 31 was granted in order to give the Office more time to respond to the motion. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 5:54 pm
  Judge Folsom granted the motion insofar as it requested prospective information, i.e. what terms would MOSAID grant a license on, as well as on past settlements and negotiations, as they were relevant to the issue of whether MOSAID was abiding with its RAND obligations in its licensing offers to the defendant. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Overall, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the court denied a motion by a tortfeasor Defendant to consolidate, for trial, two (2) separate post-Koken matters arising out of the same motor vehicle accident. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas recently addressed a Motion for Protective Order to Preclude the Completion of a Deposition Due to the Deponent's Anxiety in the wrongful death medical malpractice case of Ezrin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Research In Motion Ltd., Research in Motion Corporation, Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information Inc. [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:57 am
Viola, the RIAA has withdrawn its motion to enforce judgment.The sole reason offered in the motion papers is that "Plaintiff no longer wishes to bring this action against the debtor. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:53 am by PaulKostro
” However, for a motion seeking reconsideration of a prior order to toll the time to appeal effectively, the reconsideration motion must be timely filed. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health On February 3, 2016, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denied a motion to suppress all evidence of health care fraud seized by the government pursuant to a search warrant of Naseem Minhas’s home health care agency. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 6:26 am by JAntonelli
Antonelli Law Files […] The post Antonelli Law files a Motion to Quash against Strike 3 Holdings LLC appeared first on Torrent Defenders. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:44 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- On December 3rd, Junior Party the Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, Broad) filed its Substantive Preliminary Motion No. 1 in Interference No. 106,133 (which names Sigma-Aldrich as Senior Party), asking the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to substitute the interference Count, pursuant to the provisions of 37 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:37 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- On November 19th, Junior Party the University of California, Berkeley; the University of Vienna; and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC") filed its Substantive Preliminary Motion No. 3 in Interference No. 106,132 (which names Sigma-Aldrich as Senior Party), asking the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to substitute the Count of the interference pursuant to 37 C.F.R. [read post]