Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
They correctly invoke Hunt v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
The judgment is noteworthy for its express emphasis on the “latitude” to be given to political expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
So does former hit man John Martorano, who admitted killing 20 people. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:56 am
People have likely spoken about it as a great way to alternatively resolve seemingly intractable personal problems. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:58 pm
The Defendant was not entitled to treat people differently at different times when the criterea were the same. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:18 am
(As usual, most of the documentation can be found at SCOTUS Wiki.)BLUF: Don't talk to people you are in jail with about why you are in jail -- presume that everyone is a snitch.Corley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am
Having just reversed itself in the face of an en banc rehearing in Garcia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 11:50 am
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:02 am
And Snyder v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:02 am
Given the high barriers to entry of traditional communication channels, such as broadcast television, young people use social media to raise awareness, disseminate information, and garner supporters for the issues they care about. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:35 pm
” In Heien v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
Ressler v Farrell Fritz, P.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Arif @Ashfaq. [3]No reason was given in the order as to why the outer limit of 30 minutes prescribed in Md. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
By Eric Goldman Designer Skin, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
The court cites to AOL v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] UKSC 24 (16 June 2010) - Read judgment The Supreme Court have given the latest judgment on the controversial control order scheme, and in this case have allowed the appeal of a man suspected of terrorism on the grounds that confinement to a flat 150 miles away from his family amounted to a breach of his human rights. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
