Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 14,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 2:46 pm
While a New York Court of Appeals ruling, People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:56 am
The Texas Supreme Court granted petition for review in two Texas gay divorce cases, In re J.B. and State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:07 am
Patel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
Climate change and the Arctic: Ideas for how the United States and Canada can protect their Arctic Indigenous peoples. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:55 pm
As he points out, in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
At the end of the day, however, caring for people requires the human touch. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm
An injunction was granted. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Turner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:28 pm
The trial court rejected this argument and granted the motion to dismiss filed by Shepard. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:52 pm
Florida law has always been clear that married people or one unmarried adult can adopt a child. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:30 am
Casey (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
Georgia criminal lawyer obtains immunity for client after pretrial hearing in domestic violence case
23 Mar 2009, 3:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Sullivan, 532 U.S. 769, 771-72 (2001) (reversing granting of motion to suppress based on officer's alleged "improper subjective motivation"); United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Rodionova replied that withholding the grant does nothing to facilitate religion but does unconstitutionally disadvantage religious people. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
