Search for: "People v. House" Results 2961 - 2980 of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
(Ben also did his undergraduate studies at Point Loma Nazerene University, which is just up the street from my house. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Scott Bomboy
The Constitution’s Article V requires that an amendment be proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:46 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Section 97 of the Housing Act 1996 As we know from the Law of Property Act 1925 and the later Street v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:44 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
The bill passed through Alabama’s Republican dominated House of Representatives and Senate with overwhelming majorities. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:04 am
The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
The injunction which was granted against Mr Jones included provisions preventing him from entering a large area in central Birmingham, associating with or contacting ten people named in the injunction, and participating in music videos containing material which might relate to gangs operating in Birmingham. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
But there was no reference at all to this position in Channel 5’s programme, which portrayed the Claimants as “ordinary private people”. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am by Adam Wagner
That would have been the end of the matter, but for the House of Lords, which decided in the combined case of A v Hoare to reverse its own decision in Stubbings (1COR’s Lizanne Gumbel QC was for most of the appellants although not Mr Hoare). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
Just what processes do J.P.s use - what questions are asked and what records are kept or are warrants just granted (as many people appear to think) on the nod. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:29 pm
They already have reasonable Freedom of Speech protections (First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
The Fourth Amendment guarantees that the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. [read post]