Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 178,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 11:52 am
Anonymous Plaintiff 1, (IN App., April 4, 2024), an Indiana state appellate court held that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction in their suit claiming that the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act is violated when they are prohibited by Indiana's abortion law from obtaining an abortion that their religious beliefs direct them to obtain. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:42 am
The appellate court held that a nursing home injury plaintiff must be allowed to discuss the care given by the nursing home because it is "necessary for an understanding of plaintiff's claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:02 pm
In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $160,000 for the Plaintiff’s prolonged injuries the Court noted as follows: [159] Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:39 am
Uber Case Plaintiff Erik Adolph worked as a driver for the defendant, Uber Technologies, Inc., delivering food to customers through the company’s Uber Eats service. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:52 pm
On March 8, 2012, the company announced (here) that the lead plaintiff's action had been voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice as to the lead plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
This matter arose out of a motorcycle accident during which one Plaintiff’s decedent was operating the motorcycle and the other, separate Plaintiff’s decedent was a passenger on the motorcycle. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
Simply stated, the Court rejected the plaintiff's argument. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:08 am
In granting defendant's motion to transfer venue of plaintiff's qui tam false marking action, the court found that the convenience of the parties favored defendant. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
The plaintiff's expert relied on the expert report of another expert of plaintiff', who specialized in computer science and electronics. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:16 am
Engen) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2011 intersection collision. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:50 am
As such, the Superior Court found that the trial court properly ruled that the defense was entitled to discovery of medical records pertaining to the Plaintiff’s pre-accident mental health treatment records.In the Opinion, the Superior Court did note that general averments of shock, mental anguish and humiliation, which are routinely recoverable damages for non-economic loss in Pennsylvania, are not sufficient to place a Plaintiff’s mental condition at… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:03 am
" This purportedly highlighted shortcomings in plaintiff's ability to manage her subordinates. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 8:17 am
According to the court, the plaintiff’s demand letter estimated the plaintiff’s damages to be $37,659 on the low end and $157,659 on the high end. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:29 am
Plaintiff’s assertion that she had not consented to receiving text messages from Anthem Foundation was firmly rejected. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:01 pm
In these cases, the plaintiff must meet the “source-of-duty” rule. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
The Court saw little correlation between the plaintiffs’ claims and Apple’s argument that the iPhones may be rendered “worthless” if the plaintiffs were to prevail. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:45 am
"[Plaintiff's] claims are defenses to liability. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
§ 9-11-68) cannot be based solely upon the plaintiff’s contingent fee agreement. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:51 pm
The Court found that the posts from Plaintiff's Facebook account that reflected physical capabilities inconsistent with Plaintiff's claims of injury and limitations were relevant and embarrassment alone was found not to be a sufficient basis for excluding the posts pursuant to F.R.E. 403. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a lower court's ruling regarding the plaintiff's request to amend its complaint. [read post]
