Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 3:18 pm
State of Louisiana etc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
The appeal by the Claimant was dismissed in the SLAPP defamation case of Blair v Ford 2021 ONCA 841. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
The Queen’s Speech is reported to include the government’s plans for libel reform and cameras in court. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm
Anonymous, filed a petition for adoption of C in Queens County Family Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
& N.J. in 2002, Outar v City of New York in 2001/2005. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada et al, 2004 BCSC 1306, Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Emma QC has been involved in some of the IPKat's favourite legal disputes, including Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Matratzen Concord v Hukla and one case which, in this Kat's opinion, should never have been allowed to go to court, Reed v Reed. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:40 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm
Bard, Inc. 2:11-cv-00195 Queen, et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, the majority of the High Court in the May 2012 judgment in PGA v The Queen accepted the prosecution argument, dismissed the appeal, and upheld the decision of the Supreme Court of South Australia that Mr P could be tried and convicted of rape. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
However, the majority of the High Court in the May 2012 judgment in PGA v The Queen accepted the prosecution argument, dismissed the appeal, and upheld the decision of the Supreme Court of South Australia that Mr P could be tried and convicted of rape. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
in Flaherty v Attie ;2009 NY Slip Op 51296(U) ; Supreme Court, Queens County ; Markey, J. we see what happens. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Huesca de Crean [2011] EWHC 3154, a decision last month from Mr Justice Tugendhat is one of those slightly misplaced creatures, a case with intellectual property content but which ends up in a non-IP court (in this instance, the Queen's Bench rather than the Chancery Division of the High Court for England and Wales). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
Times addresses last week's argument in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
” In Gravel v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The Queen, 1980 CanLII 44 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 513, at p. 518). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:08 am
Corp. v Cont. [read post]
