Search for: "ROGERS v. STATE"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2007, 6:57 pm
Tager) y luego en State Farm v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Finally, North Carolina allows for advisory opinions based on judicial initiative (see Rogers and Vanberg 2002). [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
Having reviewed these general principles, the appellate court then considered the decision of the only circuit to have considered these standing questions in the context of alleged misstatements made in advance of an anticipated merger — the Second Circuit, in its 2022 decision in Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
“In fact, on numerous occasions, President Nixon expressly stated that he did not contest these points. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
President Obama’s bizarre reference to his having taught constitutional law, followed by his misstatement of Oliver Wendell Holmes’ abandoned analogy of “yelling fire in a crowed theater” from United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:43 am
Namba stated that DeNA’s purchase decision was based ngmoco’s ability to create hit iPhone games, which begs the question: what hit games? [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:25 pm
See United States v. von Weizsaecker (The Ministries Case), in 14 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, at 662 (William S. [read post]
