Search for: "Read v. People" Results 2961 - 2980 of 21,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 1:26 pm
  Or do we disproportionately label events "tragic" when we think a large number of people (e.g., nonlawyers) might be reading the opinion? [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
I feel like most of the cases with the caption "Union Pacific R.R. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
My thought when I read that was "No, you're going to pull it out (or not pull it out) on Election Day. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am by Adam Thimmesch
(I believe that it should, as do most people who have studied the issue.) [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:37 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Many of you who read this blog will know that last week, there was a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion on Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
Regina v Smith & Others [2011] EWCA Crim 1772  Read Judgment In a detailed judgment, the Court of Appeal has emphasised the importance of a sentencing court considering whether making a Sexual Offences Prevention Order is necessary and, if so, tightly drafting its terms to be proportionate and not oppressive. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
  Some people really enjoy such twits. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am by Steven Smith
Board of Education the Supreme Court implausibly read into the establishment clause to supply that clause with substantive content. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by Richard Mumford
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
Professor read in to this analogy comparing it to a store with no locks on the doors or other methods by which it would be robbed or an alternative product to jewels. [read post]