Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. L." Results 2961 - 2980 of 3,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:12 am by Elie Mystal
On his way out of the door, the dean decided to shine a light on the whole ugly mess of law school economics…Phillip J. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am by David Hart QC
 19(3) LCA represents a legitimate limitation on the scope of the right granted by the Act, well within the margin of discretion allowed to a member state under the Convention. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
It is in the interest of the State that there should be an end of lawsuits.) [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
Widely held precepts encapsulated in mainstream ADR, such as the need for a win-win agreement that satisfies the essential interests of both parties, did not resonate in The Gambia. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
  In its most recent ruling on the subject, Sincohem Int’l v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
  In its most recent ruling on the subject, Sincohem Int’l v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
This understanding not only clarifies one’s own interests and positions, but leads to an acknowledgement of the basis for the interests and positions held by others, and thereby promotes reflection by the stakeholders. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:02 pm by Larry Ribstein
J. 857, 870-73 (2009); United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  Popularly known as the “Patent Reform Act of 2005 ,” the Patent Reform Act was an omnibus bill which overhauled multiple aspects of patent practice.[3]  While this act aroused a significant amount of interest, it ultimately failed as lawmakers were unable to reconcile numerous competing interests. [read post]