Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 2961 - 2980 of 7,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
Recent foodborne illnesses have raised questions about the legal status of tara (Caesalpinia spinosa) under United States food law. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
What were the original intentions of the framers of the United States Constitution? [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:44 pm by Todd N. Tucker
United States—were 8-1 and 9-0 rulings against the so-called First New Deal. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Laurent
V Expand the small public offering exemption The JOBS Act increase [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:13 am
It is subject to approval by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The people of the United States, who through Congress have adopted and operate the Bank of the United States, are not represented in Maryland, and for that reason the part cannot tax the whole. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider, for the moment, the case of State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
  “They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The only exception to the exclusive licence was said to be “Ford’s existing non-exclusive licence in the United Kingdom”.CSL argued that the express carve-out for the United Kingdom could only make sense if the 1997 licence was being granted worldwide, and that the reference to “federal” marks was simply loose language. [read post]