Search for: "Spells v. Spells" Results 2961 - 2980 of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
”  I also have concerns about the instability of the compact – partly for the reasons Foley and Levinson spell out and also for a somewhat different reason:   even if the NPVIC were to clear all of the political and constitutional hurdles and actually become law, there is little reason to believe that it would remain in force permanently – or even for very long. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” A recruiting brochure spells out the image in more detail. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:58 am by Arlo Kipfer
If you want to provide specific benefits to a specific employee, the benefits should be spelled out in the specific employment contract. b)    Travel. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
Now, if you read this section of the transcript, it appears that Zach Scruggs did not know exactly what was meant by the Jones v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
Difficulties began when the House of Bishops took up the one Constitutional amendment which had passed at General Convention 1889, namely, an amendment to Article V which would allow General Convention to accept from any diocese a cession of some of its territory, to become a missionary diocese. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Under Maryland common law, as in New York, there is a strong presumption that an employment relationship is at-will unless the parties contract otherwise by specifying a clear duration of employment or by spelling out reasons for termination, such as just cause. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Kurt Bassuener
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]