Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 2961 - 2980 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
Late last year, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed a securities class action claim against IndyMac Financial, Inc. and several of its officers and directors because the plaintiffs failed to plead scienter. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Scott Sternberg
  The California defendant attempted to remove from state court to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma on the basis of diversity jurisdiction because at the time of the removal, the Oklahoma defendant had not yet been served. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
SBS's parent company creates and produces Korean-language television programming which is initially exhibited in Korea and then provided to SBS for television and satellite distribution in the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Lovechilde
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:43 pm
But also, in a parting shot, makes the following statement regarding the position of the attorney for the United States:"The Court notes that Respondent's primary argument â€â [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]