Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm
On July 20, 2011 the plaintiff returned to work after her doctor advised her that she was fit to do so. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Div. 2015) Following the recent opinion in State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:04 pm
Both Lewis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
Saavedra v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:52 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:51 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
In Tseng v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
Doctors determined Lubinski should be transported by air ambulance to receive lifesaving treatment in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
Sandusky Wellness Ctr., LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
State, 690 So. 2d 1132 (Miss. 1997). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 8:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
Among the more relevant opinions, her doctors stated: "At the time of the motor vehicle accident of 2006, [she] was reported by her treating caregivers to be in a state of remission from psychotic symptomatology, and was, at the time, compliant with suggested treatment. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 8:10 am
In Dunsmuir v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:19 am
Guglielmini stated that Ms. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
In Daughtery v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
This means that if a doctor deliberately gives a patient a lethal drug with the objective of ending his life, the doctor violates the law of almost every state. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
Latimer, National Law Review More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
