Search for: "State v. Fields" Results 2961 - 2980 of 11,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2013, 11:43 am by Greg Mersol
  The Dukes case and others have certainly helped to level the playing field for employers. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you work in a field that requires that you review medical records, you know that medical providers (like hospitals and doctors) will charge 75 cents per page. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
 Pix credit hereThe ICJ Registry issued a Press Release on 6 March 2024 stating that "South Africa today filed an urgent request with the Court for the indication of additional provisional measures and the modification of the Court’s Order of 26 January 2024 and decision of 16 February 2024 in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (SouthAfrica v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:52 pm by Jared Williamson
Indeed, the majority in Chevron ponders the idea that Congress leaves certain decisions to administrative agencies due to their expertise in the field, and that “judges are not experts in the field” that most agencies work under in their daily operations.[1] Such expertise was not considered by the Roberts Court in Biden v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
 Therefore, despite being a rather niche document from the aeronautical field, McDonald was still state of the art for the Xhose. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm by Barry Barnett
  So much so that Golden State courts have struck down class-action bans that show up in consumer contracts whether they apply to lawsuits, Discover Bank v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 4:41 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
One of these exemptions is the “professional exemption,” which was analyzed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Dybach v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]