Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 61,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2020, 3:36 pm
Sys., S.A. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Evaluating electors' qualifications is part of what it means to judge "returns. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:05 am
He concluded that the judge’s application of section 235 on the facts involved no distortion of its natural meaning or intended purpose. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
See Dillingham v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In Isaacson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Additional Resources: Gertiser v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
In Cisson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
What does this mean for employees and employers in the state of California? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm
In a highly anticipated case that generated much local notoriety, and in which some of my friends and colleagues participated, the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited ruling in Knick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
To credibly reason, I might instead allow you or an independent third party to inspect the coins, show you studies of their weights or chemical compositions, etc., such that if I say you win the gold coin by selecting the left hand, you have some assurance of a nexus between stated means (picking the left hand) and stated ends (winning the gold coin). [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 4:50 pm
” City of Norwood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
Congress also must tailor legislation enacted under Sec. 5 to remedy or prevent conduct transgressing the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive provisions and there must be a congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented or remedied and the means adopted to remedy that injury (see City of Boerne v Flores (1997)). [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
” In 2007, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:32 am
The issue at the center of Maryland v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:47 am
That means the plaintiffs gets a preliminary injunction that prevents the state from denying tuition benefits for that reason. [read post]
