Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 40,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 9:18 am
In Virginia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Gravel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
United States, which held Congress cannot “commandeer” state legislatures, and Printz v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
The applicant recalled the slogan “Vorsprung durchTechnik” (advantage through technology) at issue in the decision Audi v OHIM C-398/08and argued that “Sustainability through Quality” should be considered similarly distinctive, it being irrelevant that individual words such as “sustainability” or “quality” are not in themselves eligible for protection: it is the whole impression of the mark applied for that is decisive. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Conceptually, although the Board admittedly stated that the word “Google” has no specific meaning as such, it added that the term is, however, generally associated with the intervener’s internet search engine. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Although these proposals have been around for some time, recent contentious election cycles, debate over hot-button issues, including the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
If I am wrong, I will readily note the correction and eat my words, but I am sure they will be quite digestible.[6] 1915-01-15. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:00 pm
And the Supreme Court, in Gravel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
and mens rea (did Twitter have a culpable mental state?) [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:43 am
Both CNN and Fox ran State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
{The events giving rise to these two lawsuits occurred in the years preceding the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
United States and Shoop v. [read post]
