Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 2961 - 2980 of 3,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:15 am
Defendant Stephen Miknevich was charged with possession of child pornography in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  “Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
Not since Stephen Colbert declared himself Governor, have South Carolinians been so riddled with fear. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Betsy McKenzie
Apparently in the text of the post (somewhere I don't see) Sugarman transmits letters from way back in 1997 on the matter of vendor neutral citation, in which Judge Posner, among others, gave their opinions to the Chairman of the Automation & Technology Committee Judicial Conference of the United States, who was preparing a rule on the matter of citation formats. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]